
Andreas Rau, Symphony for n Metronomes: A shared time, a distributed gesture
At first, it appears as pure rhythm. Minimal pulses, digital pendulums, visual oscillations on an interface. Each element moves with essential elegance, as if dancing within a space of silence.
But it becomes clear that Symphony for n Metronomes by Andreas Rau is far from a mere algorithmic installation. It is a work that reflects on the nature of time, on the decentralization of authorship, on collective intelligence shaped through code. To explore this framework, we spoke with the artist and posed a few key questions about the development of the piece.
Fakewhale: Symphony for n Metronomes appears to invert the traditional figure of the artist-author, decentralizing control of the work in favor of a system that evolves through participant activation. How did you arrive at this reflection on decentralized authorship, and how do you see it redefining the role of the artist within the digital context?
Andreas Rau: Originally, I had this idea of a networked series. I wanted to create a shared virtual space that collectors inhabit together rather than a collection of isolated tokens that everyone owns separately. This alone is a departure from the traditional model of collecting, made possible by the networked nature of the blockchain. The concept of decentralized authorship was a logical next step to further strengthen the feeling of together shaping a shared experience. As a jazz musician, I see similarities to a jam session. Everybody can participate, yet the outcome is unknown. This concurrence of creation and performance tends to unleash a certain energy that I wanted to introduce to my code-based work. Generally, I’m interested in bending our understanding of what it means to participate in an artwork. In 2021, I made a piece called Disharmony that interacts with the blockchain and behaves differently based on how many editions you collect. Symphony for n Metronomes continues this line of thought and introduces another layer to it: Collectors’ actions have an impact not only on their own pieces, but on the entire series. This redefines the role of the collector from passive spectator to active participant, where the act of minting contributes to the piece itself. The role of the artist, in turn, is reframed from being the sole “author” to being a kind of system architect, facilitator, or even choreographer. Similar models have a long tradition both within and outside the digital context. Symphony for n Metronomes is, in many ways, inspired by Poème Symphonique for 100 Metronomes (1962) by Hungarian-Austrian composer György Ligeti. Here, one hundred mechanical metronomes are set to different speeds, started simultaneously and set loose to unwind according to their own internal logics. The artist deliberately relinquishes control almost entirely once the performance begins. Similarly, in code-based art, after an algorithm is set in motion, it proceeds autonomously and generates new outputs based on different parameters outside the artist’s control. For the now conventional blockchain-based model of long-form generative art, the transaction hash shapes the randomness of every output. In Symphony for n Metronomes, this influence goes beyond your own contribution and doesn’t end at the time of minting.


The structure of Symphony for n Metronomes is linear in logic and profound in implication.
Each time a collector mints, a new metronome is added to the system. The metronome is not merely a visual object. It is an active agent: introducing a beat, a position, a pattern. The performance becomes richer, its rhythm altered. The new element does not simply add to the whole, it reconfigures it. It shifts the internal behavior of the system. There is no isolated unit, because each part exists in dynamic relation to the others. The system is, in the fullest sense, rhizomatic and responsive. It grows, listens, restructures.
The reference to Ligeti’s Poème Symphonique (1962) is explicit, yet the paradigm shift is evident. Where Ligeti composed an acoustic installation of asymmetry and chaos with one hundred mechanical metronomes, Rau inherits that logic and recodes it within a digital environment governed by protocol and absolute time: Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Time here is not subjective, not perceptual, not embodied. It is infrastructure.
The work unfolds in alignment with Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), replacing subjective experience of time with an impersonal, global cadence. How does this technical choice also function as a conceptual statement about digital systems and blockchain infrastructure?
While not necessarily trying to make a statement about digital systems or blockchain infrastructure, the work undeniably inhabits the same conceptual space as the blockchain itself. Decentralization is at its very core; and every attempt to decentralization needs some global consensus, not only about content, but about the order of events. In digital systems, and especially in blockchain networks, time must be coordinated across distributed nodes that span the globe. In the absence of a central authority, UTC becomes a neutral arbiter, providing the temporal consensus necessary for distributed systems to synchronize. Conceptually, then, using UTC situates the work within the same worldview that informs blockchain architecture. It foregrounds a tension between the human and the machine, between experiential time and infrastructural time. I’m not sure if I would call it replacing, but rather expanding: It expands our subjective experience of time into a shared, global one. This conceptual expansion is important in that we can experience the work as a networked entity, formed of many individual contributions that share a common clock.
Already in my 2024 work Stairs & Stocks , I use UTC to synchronize outputs at certain times. In Symphony for n Metronomes, I take this concept one step further: The piece is fundamentally about rhythms, timing, and synchronization. The choice of metronomes is crucial: A symbol of precision and temporal regulation, an almost authoritarian tool imposed on musicians to follow strict timing, now cast in an absurdist performance where each participant follows its own ever-changing rhythm; sometimes in sync, sometimes out of sync, but always aware of each others presence.

Each metronome follows the same universal cadence.
The system is not synchronized to an artist but to a global network. The Ethereum blockchain becomes more than technical infrastructure. It becomes score and archive, environment and memory.
This impersonal, almost cosmic temporality generates an experience that is simultaneously visual, sonic, conceptual, and social. The code, written by Rau, is not designed to reproduce forms, but to generate relationships. Every visual element is a node within a temporal web. Each act of collection introduces an interference into the overall composition. The collector does not own. They participate. The mint is not the end of a process but its inception. Each iteration contains the full logic of the work, like a self-sufficient cell that only fully lives within the collective body.
One of the most compelling insights in Symphony for n Metronomes is that minting initiates the process rather than concluding it. The work lives and expands through participation. Could you share how you conceived of minting not as an act of acquisition, but as a generative, almost performative gesture?
The idea of minting as an initiating act rather than a finalizing one is central to the conceptual framework. Traditionally, minting is framed around individual ownership: a transactional moment where a collector acquires a finished object. While publicly logged on-chain, its consequences remain confined to the boundaries of your own piece. I was interested in expanding this act towards a collective gesture, where your action has an immediate impact on everybody else. In Symphony for n Metronomes, the mint doesn’t mark the end of the artwork’s creation; it’s what sets it into motion. Each mint extends the piece’s reach, enlists new participants, and contributes to its unfolding narrative. In that sense, collectors aren’t just recipients, they’re collaborators, witnesses, even performers. The work gains dimension and vitality through these interactions. So, minting here becomes an act of participation, of engagement, almost a public declaration of alignment with the work’s ethos. It’s generative because it creates new relations, new contexts. And it’s performative because each instance of minting carries with it intention, visibility, and consequence. That shift in perspective was really important to me, reframing digital ownership as something more fluid, networked, and alive

The interface, accessible at met.andreasrau.eu , functions as a real-time window into this rhythmic architecture.
It reveals movement, density, trajectories. It also reveals the names of collectors, inscribed into the system not as signatures but as participants in a shared action. Three levels of engagement emerge: Metronome, Ensemble, Orchestra. These are not hierarchies. They are modulations of visibility. Some metronomes perform solos. Others move in groups. Others still occupy the grid in silence. It is a relational display system, where centrality is earned through participation, not authority.
What gives Symphony for n Metronomes its force is its ability to make visible a form of time native to the network: asynchronous, cumulative, stratified.
There is no beginning or end. Only growth, proliferation, a slow but steady construction. There is no climax, no resolution. Only transformation.
Yet in this silent progression, the work also reflects how we inhabit the digital. It speaks to the need to contribute without dominating, to belong to a form without possessing it. It speaks to the intelligence of code as poetic space, and to blockchain as creative infrastructure. And above all, it speaks to the collector as activator. No longer a spectator. No longer a custodian. The one who mints participates. The one who participates alters the work for everyone. It is a new ethics of vision.
Symphony for n Metronomes is, in every sense, a performance that unfolds not in space but in time.
It is not to be watched. It is to be entered. And within its code resonates a deeply contemporary intuition. What truly matters today is not the artwork as object, but the artwork as condition, as system, as a network of relations.
Rau achieves something rare. Constructing a work that is entirely logical yet radically sensitive. A work that is seen with the eyes but felt in time. One that does not end as long as someone continues to participate. A symphony not for one hundred metronomes, but for as many as the system can receive. An endless symphony, writing itself through time, asking only to become part of the beat.
—
Andreas Rau (b. 1990) is a generative artist whose work explores the interplay between humans and their physical and digital environments.
Based between Berlin and Oslo, he develops systems using code and electronics, creating works that operate through real-time behavior and continuous dialog with the machine.
His practice includes interactive installations, audiovisual performances, and physical artifacts entirely generated from code.
Across formats, he investigates how autonomous systems can form shared spatial experiences, both online and in physical display.
Rau often merges the score and the execution in a single gesture, where each iteration contains the full logic of the work.
His projects have been shown internationally and acquired by both private and institutional collectors.

SYMPHONY FOR N METRONOMES
by Andreas Rau
Live June 25, 2025
7:00 PM CEST / 1:00 PM EDT
A generative performance evolving in real time through collectors’ actions.
Presented by Fakewhale on Verse
Minting window: 48 hours
Each mint actively drives the evolution of the generative work
Unique editions – 30 USD per mint
fakewhale
Founded in 2021, Fakewhale advocates the digital art market's evolution. Viewing NFT technology as a container for art, and leveraging the expansive scope of digital culture, Fakewhale strives to shape a new ecosystem in which art and technology become the starting point, rather than the final destination.
You may also like
Bruce Nauman and the Art of Experimentation
Bruce Nauman ‘s Transformation Born in Indiana in 1941, Bruce initially turned to the world of
Fakewhale in dialogue with Julie Insun Youn
Julie Insun Youn worked in traditional painting for over a decade and, since 2015, has shifted to &#
The Sigg Art Foundation: Curating Global Cultural Synergies
In the contemporary art world, a nuanced evolution is taking place as artists quietly yet assertivel