
The Digital Frontier of a New Artistic Underground
Every collapse hides a possibility. The fall of the contemporary art market (especially its upper tier) is not the end of art, but the exhaustion of a system that has mistaken visibility for meaning. What follows is not silence, but a slow reconfiguration, a search for new forms of expression capable of existing outside the logic of speculation and spectacle.
If the twentieth century belonged to the gallery, the studio, and the museum, the twenty-first belongs to the screen. The digital realm is no longer a parallel dimension, it has become, in many ways, the dominant environment of perception, production, and circulation. Today, art is experienced, observed, and remembered primarily through a digital lens. And it is precisely here, within this immaterial expanse of code, networks, and collective interfaces, that a new underground is taking shape.
This emerging culture does not seek legitimacy from institutions, nor does it depend on market validation. It grows through experimentation, through the tension between noise and meaning, through the fluidity of interaction. The digital, once seen as the space of reproduction, is now becoming the space of reinvention.
Perhaps this is the true frontier of our time, a new kind of wild west where art can once again risk failure, contradiction, and transformation. In the void left by the collapse of old certainties, the digital is not an escape from reality but the only ground upon which a new one can truly emerge.
The End of Certainty: When Systems Collapse, Energy Returns
Every system, when it reaches its point of saturation, implodes on itself. Not from a lack of strength, but from an excess of balance. This is what is happening to contemporary art after decades of continuous expansion: its language has consumed itself in rhetoric, its forms have emptied under the weight of visibility, and the market, which for years acted as a symbolic guarantee, has lost its mythological function.
But collapses, throughout cultural history, have always been moments of release. When a system gives way, it frees the energy it once held in compression. What we are witnessing today is not the death of a language, but the dissolution of its controlling structures. Institutions, fairs, market logics, all that once dictated the rhythm and value of art, are entering a phase of rarefaction. And in the void that opens, something begins to move again.
It is an underground energy, still shapeless but alive. It does not seek legitimacy, nor does it ask for recognition. It exists out of sheer necessity, out of the urge to build new meanings beyond established circuits. It is a return to experimentation as a form of survival, to creation as a radical gesture of presence.
Collapse, then, is not merely loss, it is an act of liberation. It destroys obsolete structures to make room for the unexpected. Each time art passes through a crisis, it renews its reason for being. And today, as the traditional system crumbles, we may be witnessing the birth of a new cycle, no longer vertical and institutional but horizontal and diffuse, where creative energy flows freely again, without permissions or frames.
From the White Space to the Screen
For decades, the place of art was the white space: the gallery, the museum, the institution. Environments built to contain, isolate, and sanctify. There, the artwork acquired status and recognition, protected by an aura of silence and distance. But today, that space is no longer enough. It is as if reality itself has shifted its perceptual center, and with it, art has moved too.
The screen has become the new architecture of vision. It is the place where images are born, multiply, and dissolve. It is no longer a medium, but an ecosystem, the true cognitive environment of our time. Desires, opinions, and languages are formed on it. It is through the screen that we look, remember, and interpret. And it is there, inevitably, that art now finds itself having to dwell.
This shift is not merely technological, but ontological. The artwork no longer lives in the physical relationship between body and material, but in the interval between image and attention. Experience has become dematerialized, but not impoverished; it has become simultaneous, interactive, and collective. Every visual gesture is connected to a network of other gestures, every work is part of a flow.
The digital realm, far from being a simple translation, has become the very place where art is perceived, discussed, and largely generated. It is not about replacing the real with the virtual, but about recognizing that our experience of the real already passes through the digital. Here new mythologies, new aesthetics, and new communities of meaning are being formed.
In this context, the screen is not the end of presence, but its metamorphosis. The artwork, which once asked to be reached, now reaches us. It inhabits our everyday life as a stream, a notification, a shared image. And perhaps, within this ubiquity, lies a new possibility: to return to art a more fluid, more contaminated life, one that is closer to the way we truly live and think.
The Digital Underground: A New Ecology of Experimentation
As the traditional art system implodes under the weight of its own conventions, a new ecosystem is taking shape on the margins of the digital realm. Invisible to institutional radars, yet vital, fluid, and radically experimental. It is a global underground, decentralized, fragmented, collective, where artists move with the freedom of those who have nothing left to lose.
Here, art asks for no permission. It emerges where code meets imagination: between a glitch and an algorithm, between a feed and an interface. Platforms become laboratories, social media channels turn into networks of spontaneous distribution, and digital communities evolve into new forms of shared collecting. It is a territory where the boundaries between author and audience, work and process, vision and participation dissolve.
This underground scene is not measured by success or recognition, but by presence. Digital art does not seek to represent reality, it inhabits it. Every pixel becomes an act, every piece of data a gesture. The work may exist as a temporary file, an immersive experience, an ephemeral exchange between two screens, and yet, within this fragility, it finds its strength.
Decentralization has made possible what the centralized system could no longer contain: the multiplication of languages, aesthetic disobedience, and the immediacy of the gesture. No curatorial filters, no mediation, only pure energy flowing from one server to another, like a collective pulse.
And in this new landscape, where images, codes, and hybrid realities emerge every day, art becomes once again what it was at its origins: a territory of risk. Not an industry, but a field of possibilities. Not a showcase, but a permanent experiment.
The digital, in this sense, is no longer an extension of the real, but its reinvention. It is here, in this anarchic and pulsating space, that a new culture is taking shape: less polished, more honest, more necessary. An underground capable of generating forms the market would not even know how to name.
Beyond Visibility: Risk, Process, and Imperfection
In the digital world, visibility is no longer an achievement, it is a sentence. The excess of exposure has emptied the image of its power, reducing art to a continuous flow of interchangeable content. Yet, within this state of saturation, a counter-movement is emerging, a new sensibility that chooses shadow over light, process over result, and imperfection as a language of truth.
The artists who inhabit the deeper layers of the digital, far from the algorithms of consensus, are not trying to optimize their presence, but to sabotage it. Error becomes method, failure becomes part of the process, and instability becomes a sign of vitality. In an ecosystem where everything tends toward repetition, difference no longer arises from excellence, but from the unexpected.
The digital artwork lives through metamorphosis: it changes, deforms, multiplies. It is not an object but a flow, a temporary organism that breathes through the network. What matters is no longer its permanence, but its capacity to generate experience. The artist no longer produces pieces, but processes, circuits of meaning that open and close, leaving traces rather than results.
From this perspective, imperfection becomes a form of resistance. Against the algorithm, which seeks to predict, classify, and homogenize, art opposes error as a political act, a way to reaffirm the unpredictable. The glitch, the anomaly, the bug are not flaws to be corrected, but testimonies of humanity within the system.
It is an aesthetics of vulnerability, where strength is born from fragility and beauty from instability. A language that accepts its own transience as a natural condition. Because in the digital realm, where everything flows and everything is archived, only what refuses to be fixed truly manages to survive.
The Digital as the Only Horizon
There is no longer an “outside” to the digital, it has become one of the new spaces of experience, the most accessible, free, and pervasive place where reality is perceived, narrated, and endlessly rewritten. Art is not an exception to this, it belongs here. It has become part of the language, the grammar, the very breath of the digital. Every artistic gesture, even the most physical or material, now exists also through its digital extension, the image, the flow, the shared memory that translates and prolongs it.
The digital is not a cultural condition, it is the environment where art holds the potential to regenerate itself, where new sensitivities are formed, where experimentation happens without permission. It is not an alternative dimension to the real, but reality itself, seen through a different density. Here, value can once again become experience, encounters can become intimate again, and experimentation can once again take on a collective meaning.
In the old system, the digital was seen as an extension, or even a threat, but if we look squarely at reality, today it is the only infrastructure capable of sustaining a new form of creative freedom. It enables access, diffusion, and the building of communities beyond geography and institutions. It is the open territory where thought can move without a map, where experimentation finds its natural rhythm, that of immediacy, connection, and the infinite possibility of transformation.
Perhaps this is the hidden promise within the collapse of the old world: that art, freed from the weight of its institutions, might finally learn to breathe again within the network, fragile at times, unstable, yet alive. In this new digital vastness, boundless yet full of possibility, art may rediscover not only its voice, but its meaning.
fakewhale
Founded in 2021, Fakewhale advocates the digital art market's evolution. Viewing NFT technology as a container for art, and leveraging the expansive scope of digital culture, Fakewhale strives to shape a new ecosystem in which art and technology become the starting point, rather than the final destination.
You may also like
9 – Finding Duke Dasher
Rockford, Illinois, United States Patrick Kibby had palmed the security guard on duty twenty dollars
Between Prom Nights and Protest Signs: Anne Imhof’s DOOM House of Hope at the Park Avenue Armory
We at Fakewhale followed the buzz around Anne Imhof’s much-anticipated return to New York, where h
What Remains of the Gesture: Fables, Algorithms, and the Melancholy of the Mechanical. Ryan Gander at Basament, Roma
“We are what we repeatedly do,” Aristotle once said. But in a time when repetition is dictated m




