Daniel Turner: Material Transformation, Memory, and the Poetics of Residue
Dissolution and Persistence of Form
Daniel Turner’s work exists in a space where materiality is both presence and absence, where objects are not simply created but transformed, reduced, or even erased. His sculptural practice does not rely on traditional notions of form but instead explores how matter can be subjected to time, corrosion, and physical alteration. By using industrial processes such as oxidation, combustion, and dissolution, Turner challenges the idea of permanence in sculpture, shifting the focus toward residue, memory, and the traces left behind.
Born in Virginia in 1983 and now based in New York, Turner operates at the intersection of sculpture, chemistry, and phenomenology. His work is not about creating autonomous objects but about staging interactions between materials and the spaces they inhabit. The absence of a fixed form in his pieces makes his practice a reflection on impermanence, where sculptures become processes rather than static entities.
What sets Turner apart from other contemporary sculptors is his ability to make materials speak beyond their physicality. He does not simply use steel, rust, or soot as formal elements but as carriers of memory, transformation, and entropy. In some of his most striking works, entire spaces are altered through chemical reactions, dissolving previous structures and leaving behind stains, patinas, or traces of what once was. This approach places him in dialogue with artists like Robert Rauschenberg and Gordon Matta-Clark, figures who similarly explored the potential of erasure and material mutation as forms of artistic intervention.
Turner’s practice invites the viewer to reconsider sculpture as something that is not necessarily built but rather deconstructed, unmade, or dispersed. His installations often exist on the edge of perception, where the viewer must engage with subtle changes in texture, light, and matter rather than with defined shapes or volumes. This makes his work as much about experience as it is about material transformation.
In the next chapter, we will examine how Turner employs industrial materials and chemical processes to turn destruction into a sculptural act, exploring how his works capture the tension between disappearance and persistence.
Matter as Witness: Transformations and Residues
Daniel Turner’s sculptures do not present themselves as static compositions but as material testimonies of transformation. His work is rooted in processes that alter, degrade, and reconfigure physical substances, making time and chemistry integral to his artistic vocabulary. Rather than sculpting in a traditional sense, Turner engages in acts of dissolution, exposing materials to oxidation, combustion, and abrasion until they acquire a new identity.
His use of industrial materials like steel, soot, and rust is not merely aesthetic but deeply conceptual. These elements bear the marks of change, retaining visible traces of their past conditions. In many of his works, entire objects or environments undergo radical alterations, leaving behind only a residue or a stain. A room that once functioned as a waiting area is transformed into solid bars of metal, the walls of an institutional space are darkened through a chemical process, or the remains of a dissolved cafeteria are absorbed into the floor itself. These interventions turn absence into a sculptural presence, inviting the viewer to perceive the work not just as a physical entity but as evidence of an event.
Turner’s practice often revolves around the idea that matter holds memory, that surfaces retain the history of their use and transformation. His pieces suggest that destruction is not an endpoint but a stage in the life cycle of materials, a phase where the object is no longer what it was but not yet something entirely new. This concept aligns him with artists who have explored materiality as a site of meaning, from the burned canvases of Alberto Burri to the environmental erosions of Richard Serra.
His use of residues also plays with the notion of visibility and permanence. Many of his works do not impose themselves on the space but merge with it, requiring careful attention to detect the subtle shifts in texture and tone. The viewer is drawn into an active engagement, where the act of looking becomes a process of uncovering what remains after a transformation has taken place.
In the next chapter, we will explore how Turner incorporates the human presence into his work, using surfaces and traces to capture the ephemeral relationship between bodies, space, and material memory.
The Body in Absence: Space, Contact, and Human Traces
Daniel Turner’s work is not only about the transformation of materials but also about the residual presence of the human body within space. His sculptures often evoke a sense of absence, where human interaction is implied rather than directly represented. The surfaces he alters, the objects he dissolves, and the stains he creates function as silent witnesses to past actions, carrying the memory of physical contact. His work does not depict the body, but it registers its trace, much like an industrial ghost that lingers within the material.
Many of his works are the result of a process where touch, pressure, or movement is translated into material evidence. In certain installations, entire walls bear marks of human presence, whether through smudges of oxidized steel or surfaces that appear to have been rubbed or polished by unseen hands. This approach suggests that spaces are not just passive environments but living records of the interactions that have taken place within them. A waiting room, a hospital corridor, or a factory floor can all become sites of memory, even when the individuals who once occupied them are no longer present.
This emphasis on trace and contact aligns Turner’s practice with artists who have explored the ephemeral nature of human presence in material form. The conceptual imprints of Félix González-Torres, the atmospheric residue in the works of Wolfgang Laib, and the forensic minimalism of Teresa Margolles all resonate with Turner’s method of capturing human absence. Unlike traditional sculpture, which asserts its physicality through mass and permanence, his works often exist at the threshold of disappearance, where what is left behind is as important as what has been removed.
In Turner’s practice, the relationship between body and material is both physical and psychological. His works operate at a sensory level, engaging the viewer in a way that feels almost intimate. The act of perceiving his sculptures often requires a slowing down, a heightened awareness of subtle shifts in texture and tone. This demand for attention turns the act of viewing into an act of recognition, as if discovering a presence embedded within the material itself.
In the next chapter, we will examine how Turner expands the definition of sculpture beyond the traditional object, using atmospheric, spatial, and ephemeral elements to challenge the very notion of what sculpture can be.
Expanded Sculpture: Beyond the Object
Daniel Turner’s work challenges the conventional definition of sculpture by pushing it beyond the constraints of physical form. His practice is not centered on the production of static objects but on the transformation of space, atmosphere, and material presence. His sculptures do not necessarily occupy a room as separate entities but instead become embedded within it, altering its conditions through chemical, physical, and environmental interventions.
Rather than constructing monumental or self-contained works, Turner engages with sculpture as an ongoing process of change. Many of his pieces involve acts of erasure, corrosion, or dispersion, where a material’s presence is felt more through its absence than through its solidity. His works often appear as stains on walls, burnished surfaces, or industrial residues that merge with their surroundings, making it difficult to determine where the sculpture begins and ends. In doing so, he moves away from the idea of sculpture as an isolated object and into the realm of the immersive, where the entire space becomes part of the work.
This expansion of sculpture aligns him with artists who have explored the dissolution of the art object in favor of spatial and atmospheric effects. Turner’s interventions recall the conceptual strategies of Robert Irwin, who used light and perception to redefine space, and the material investigations of Lygia Clark, who dissolved the barrier between artwork and viewer. His approach also echoes the work of artists like Lawrence Weiner, for whom the idea of material presence could be as significant as the material itself.
What sets Turner apart is his ability to make sculpture function as both a physical and a psychological presence. His works alter perception, often operating at the edge of visibility, where the viewer must adjust their way of looking to fully grasp the extent of the transformation. This engagement with space turns his work into something experiential, a form of sculpture that is less about the thing itself and more about the conditions it creates.
In the next and final chapter, we will consider Turner’s legacy within contemporary art, examining how his radical approach to materiality and transformation continues to redefine the possibilities of sculpture today.
An Art of Residue and Persistence
Daniel Turner’s work stands as a testament to the power of transformation, dissolution, and the unseen forces that shape material and space. His practice challenges the very notion of what sculpture can be, shifting it away from static objects and into the realm of processes, traces, and environmental conditions. By allowing industrial materials to corrode, dissolve, or imprint themselves onto surfaces, he creates works that exist in a state of flux, capturing both the memory of their previous forms and the inevitability of their transformation.
Turner’s influence within contemporary art lies in his ability to make absence feel tangible. His sculptures often do not assert themselves aggressively in space but rather require an attentive gaze, a heightened awareness of the subtleties of matter and time. This approach connects him to a broader lineage of artists who have sought to expand sculpture beyond traditional form, from the atmospheric interventions of James Turrell to the ephemeral gestures of Félix González-Torres. Yet Turner’s work is uniquely grounded in material history, engaging with the industrial, the architectural, and the residual in ways that make his sculptures feel simultaneously familiar and alien.
His art is not about permanence but about persistence. Even when his materials have been reduced to stains, deposits, or marks on a wall, they continue to exist as records of transformation, physical evidence of time and process. This tension between presence and disappearance is what makes his work so compelling. It forces the viewer to reconsider what constitutes a sculpture, what remains after something has been removed, and how the material world is in a constant state of becoming.
Turner’s legacy will likely be defined by this radical approach to materiality. At a time when contemporary art often leans toward spectacle, his work offers a quieter but equally powerful meditation on change, entropy, and the ways in which objects and spaces hold memory. His sculptures do not simply exist; they evolve, decay, and persist, reminding us that art, like matter itself, is never truly fixed.
fakewhale
Founded in 2021, Fakewhale advocates the digital art market's evolution. Viewing NFT technology as a container for art, and leveraging the expansive scope of digital culture, Fakewhale strives to shape a new ecosystem in which art and technology become the starting point, rather than the final destination.
You may also like
COMPRESSION TIME at gokou studio, Tokyo
“COMPRESSION TIME,” curated by gokou, at gokou studio, Tokyo, 12-15/9/2024, 20-23/9/2024
What I Learned by Staging a Pandemic at Sundance
This article provided an opportunity to revisit materials that I haven’t viewed in years. Much of
Fakewhale in Dialogue with Jacopo Benassi: The Visceral Tension of an Uncompromising Vision
Fakewhale had the pleasure of speaking with Jacopo Benassi, a multifaceted artist who moves fluidly
